442.com
#4
Got the following message on Firefox:
The connection has timed out
The server at www.442.com is taking too long to respond.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
The connection has timed out
The server at www.442.com is taking too long to respond.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
#7
Anyone know who specifically Brothers Automotive runs the site? If they don't mind, I'd love to at least backup the information there. Too much good stuff to lose if they go down. I'd gladly take the domain name too
#8
Ya it does this. If you ping it, it comes back as a Ethernet IP not a real server. Its a small operation started many years ago. It lacks some of the more popular modern features that this site has. It needs an update for sure. That costs money and time. It was for sale at one time. I dont think the moderator/owner is interested in up dating at least he wasn't. Lots of great info there. I sure hope he has it all backed up real good. 69Olds.com was another good one but that went belly up.
#9
It needs an update for sure. That costs money and time. It was for sale at one time. I dont think the moderator/owner is interested in up dating at least he wasn't. Lots of great info there. I sure hope he has it all backed up real good. 69Olds.com was another good one but that went belly up.
#10
That would be awesome Joffroi!
worked hard over there on the faq section. It is set up
for navagation with no bs. It would be sweet if
CO's faq worked like 442.com's does.
I know some of the info there is off, but J.P. & C.W.
are here now and some of the others as well.
IMOP, this IS the best site... Time for an update?
I tip my hat to you site adminstrators, moderators,
web caster masters, You guys rock, Thanks.
#11
I also have to say that Chris Witt gets the majority of the credit, especially for his hard work in documenting casting numbers. Of course, his, er, sense of humor in how he described certain applications has occasionally led to confusion on the part of some readers.
#12
Well darn.
Years ago, after I got to Marble and
the kid's were on their own and I
was looking at getting back into my Oldsmobiling,
442.com was found and I got a refresher
course from you boys, I haven't been there
in a while, but the faq was the reason
I would go back to it and still do once in
a while. The faq is awesome.
My thanks again guys, Adam.
Years ago, after I got to Marble and
the kid's were on their own and I
was looking at getting back into my Oldsmobiling,
442.com was found and I got a refresher
course from you boys, I haven't been there
in a while, but the faq was the reason
I would go back to it and still do once in
a while. The faq is awesome.
My thanks again guys, Adam.
#14
Wow, I haven't visted over there for a long time. I've all ways been under the impression that the FAQ was hosted on one or two other sites, but I sure can't remember them.
Ok, I just remembered it was Olds Junction but its not there anymore.
Ok, I just remembered it was Olds Junction but its not there anymore.
#15
#16
Guys, apparently I need to remind you that Wild About Cars is building a library of of information that transcends everything that is in the old (and outdated) Olds FAQs.
Straight original documentation ("primary" sources) is in the AHPS library there. Compiled information ("secondary" sources) is in the Tech section on the Wild About Cars side, look under "Techipedia". The Olds FAQs is entirely secondary information.
The Tech section is really robust because all information contained there can be, and is backed up by reference material complimented by pics and links directly to the reference material. For example, see how the '70-'71 Cutlass SX is done:
http://wildaboutcarsonline.com/cgi-b...aldisplayed=50
You don't have to "take the word" of the writer, because where the info comes from is referenced.
More content is being added to both the library and the Tech sections on a continual basis, and the amount of Olds content already far surpasses what is in the Olds FAQs.
And also unlike the Olds FAQs, all WAC content can be updated and provisions have been made to save and keep the content available so it won't be here today and gone tomorrow.
I also need to point out that WAC is a collaborative effort. The 200,000+ page views already on site didn't get there on their own or from some bankrolled corporation. It takes hard work from those that really care about preserving and making available this information.
So if anyone reading this is inclined to help out, or knows someone who may be interested, the door at Wild About Cars is always open.
Straight original documentation ("primary" sources) is in the AHPS library there. Compiled information ("secondary" sources) is in the Tech section on the Wild About Cars side, look under "Techipedia". The Olds FAQs is entirely secondary information.
The Tech section is really robust because all information contained there can be, and is backed up by reference material complimented by pics and links directly to the reference material. For example, see how the '70-'71 Cutlass SX is done:
http://wildaboutcarsonline.com/cgi-b...aldisplayed=50
You don't have to "take the word" of the writer, because where the info comes from is referenced.
More content is being added to both the library and the Tech sections on a continual basis, and the amount of Olds content already far surpasses what is in the Olds FAQs.
And also unlike the Olds FAQs, all WAC content can be updated and provisions have been made to save and keep the content available so it won't be here today and gone tomorrow.
I also need to point out that WAC is a collaborative effort. The 200,000+ page views already on site didn't get there on their own or from some bankrolled corporation. It takes hard work from those that really care about preserving and making available this information.
So if anyone reading this is inclined to help out, or knows someone who may be interested, the door at Wild About Cars is always open.
#17
It was pretty much the main Oldsmobile site in the early years when the "Bryceman" started it. I think he sold it. They never updated the car gallery etc. It got stagnant. I still checked it out occasionally. I noticed last week there weren't any new/recently posted cars for sale. I like "window shopping" but my retirement resolution was "don't buy any more Oldsmobiles." I've only fell off the wagon once but because it was a parts car, it doesn't count. I hope the site survives. Anyone remember Lisa's Oldsmobile site? I loved that site. Free classified ads. I bought/sold a lot of Olds parts/cars through the site. Bickering by a couple guy's (ya, one that is on this site) caused her to shut it down. She warned them but it was more important to try to win their arguments so she pulled the plug. This is a great site but so were those two at one time, lets hope this site doesn't go downhill. Jmo, Ken
#19
As said over the years the site goes down for a week or days and pops back up but I would not be surprised if it does not especially if Brothers Parts is a sponsor. I used to enjoy the chat line they had there as it was very busy at the start but man did it have problems keeping you on. Too bad the chat here on Classic Olds is so stagnant.
#20
Just put a post there for "them" to read. Last time I made contact it was with Brycemann. It wasn't that long ago...I think.
Maybe we should do a collaborative effort here in attempt to resurrect the site somehow. At least pull it out of the dark ages and show who ever owns it now that we are interested is doing something for the sites sake. Im willing to help. If it involves purchase or what ever. I realize it would involve a little more than that. I've been posting there for at least a dozen years. There is plenty of info that shouldn't be lost to cyber space just in the posted threads alone then there's the FAQ. The site is different enough to differentiate it from CO. Dont want to step on COs toes nor any others.
joffori, Joe, Kurt what do you think we should do something for the sake of Olds and that site?
Steve
Maybe we should do a collaborative effort here in attempt to resurrect the site somehow. At least pull it out of the dark ages and show who ever owns it now that we are interested is doing something for the sites sake. Im willing to help. If it involves purchase or what ever. I realize it would involve a little more than that. I've been posting there for at least a dozen years. There is plenty of info that shouldn't be lost to cyber space just in the posted threads alone then there's the FAQ. The site is different enough to differentiate it from CO. Dont want to step on COs toes nor any others.
joffori, Joe, Kurt what do you think we should do something for the sake of Olds and that site?
Steve
#21
Just put a post there for "them" to read. Last time I made contact it was with Brycemann. It wasn't that long ago...I think.
Maybe we should do a collaborative effort here in attempt to resurrect the site somehow. At least pull it out of the dark ages and show who ever owns it now that we are interested is doing something for the sites sake. Im willing to help. If it involves purchase or what ever. I realize it would involve a little more than that. I've been posting there for at least a dozen years. There is plenty of info that shouldn't be lost to cyber space just in the posted threads alone then there's the FAQ. The site is different enough to differentiate it from CO. Dont want to step on COs toes nor any others.
joffori, Joe, Kurt what do you think we should do something for the sake of Olds and that site?
Steve
Maybe we should do a collaborative effort here in attempt to resurrect the site somehow. At least pull it out of the dark ages and show who ever owns it now that we are interested is doing something for the sites sake. Im willing to help. If it involves purchase or what ever. I realize it would involve a little more than that. I've been posting there for at least a dozen years. There is plenty of info that shouldn't be lost to cyber space just in the posted threads alone then there's the FAQ. The site is different enough to differentiate it from CO. Dont want to step on COs toes nor any others.
joffori, Joe, Kurt what do you think we should do something for the sake of Olds and that site?
Steve
#22
#23
It was pretty much the main Oldsmobile site in the early years when the "Bryceman" started it. I think he sold it. They never updated the car gallery etc. It got stagnant. I still checked it out occasionally. I noticed last week there weren't any new/recently posted cars for sale. I like "window shopping" but my retirement resolution was "don't buy any more Oldsmobiles." I've only fell off the wagon once but because it was a parts car, it doesn't count. I hope the site survives. Anyone remember Lisa's Oldsmobile site? I loved that site. Free classified ads. I bought/sold a lot of Olds parts/cars through the site. Bickering by a couple guy's (ya, one that is on this site) caused her to shut it down. She warned them but it was more important to try to win their arguments so she pulled the plug. This is a great site but so were those two at one time, lets hope this site doesn't go downhill. Jmo, Ken
I procured and held a car for him, and scouted a blown engine for sale also, so in return when I was jobless he waived advertising costs on the site. I never made much selling rusty junk- need billions of buyers I guess- or the callous nature to screw folks.
Lisa's site was great until one day it was no longer in existence.
One reason I largely refrain from posting in reply to stooopid stuff anymore. If you ck my post history you will find mostly helpful, sometimes humorous, and rarely pot stirring. Recently, Mr. Hell-69 for example got only the barest and factual reply to his incredibly rude remark thrown my way in response to a humorous barb at how thin skinned some folks seem to be.
#24
Just put a post there for "them" to read. Last time I made contact it was with Brycemann. It wasn't that long ago...I think.
Maybe we should do a collaborative effort here in attempt to resurrect the site somehow. At least pull it out of the dark ages and show who ever owns it now that we are interested is doing something for the sites sake. Im willing to help. If it involves purchase or what ever. I realize it would involve a little more than that. I've been posting there for at least a dozen years. There is plenty of info that shouldn't be lost to cyber space just in the posted threads alone then there's the FAQ. The site is different enough to differentiate it from CO. Dont want to step on COs toes nor any others.
joffori, Joe, Kurt what do you think we should do something for the sake of Olds and that site?
Steve
Maybe we should do a collaborative effort here in attempt to resurrect the site somehow. At least pull it out of the dark ages and show who ever owns it now that we are interested is doing something for the sites sake. Im willing to help. If it involves purchase or what ever. I realize it would involve a little more than that. I've been posting there for at least a dozen years. There is plenty of info that shouldn't be lost to cyber space just in the posted threads alone then there's the FAQ. The site is different enough to differentiate it from CO. Dont want to step on COs toes nor any others.
joffori, Joe, Kurt what do you think we should do something for the sake of Olds and that site?
Steve
#25
I don't have a clue about what's involved in creating and running a site but I appreciate the time and effort that the owners put into them. I use both of the members sites and I'm thankful for them. It's like having an auto library and a Oldsmobile classified section without leaving the house. Thanks Guys! Ken
#26
Terry
#28